At best, the study found an association between coffee-drinking and lower coronary calcium scores. This is long way from proving causation, a more difficult challenge that would require a randomised forward-looking study
A recent article in the Irish Times questions a study in Heart journal :-
“People who drink three to five coffees a day are less
likely to develop clogged arteries that could lead to heart attacks” is a
headline that must have sent coffee drinkers’ hearts beating faster in
anticipation of future guilt-free consumption.
It follows the publication of
a study in the medical journal Heart, which studied a group of more than 25,000
South Korean men and women with an average age of 41, who had no signs of heart
disease.
The researchers at the Kangbuk
Samsung Hospital in Seoul examined the relationship between levels of coffee
consumption and the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, which is calculated
from a CT scan.
Both the press releases and reportage of the research
left much to be desired. At best, the study found an association between
coffee-drinking and lower coronary calcium scores. This is long way from
proving causation, a more difficult challenge that would require a randomised
forward-looking study.
Then there is the issue of the
CAC score itself. This is a parallel marker indicating the possibility of a
furred-up coronary artery. However, it is not the gold standard measurement –
that is an angiograph which directly visualises each coronary artery and is the
ultimate arbiter of the presence of coronary heart disease.
“Moderate coffee consumption lessens risk of clogged
arteries and heart attacks.” It has all become more than a little confusing.
Not long ago, coffee was a confirmed member of the “bad for you club”. Now it
is claimed to be so good you should drink up to five cups a day to avoid
developing heart disease.
Fat is another dietary factor
that has undergone rehabilitation. For decades we were advised to avoid
saturated fat to keep our cholesterol in check.
People stopped eating steak
and limited their egg and milk intake. The resulting gap was filled with sugar
and carbohydrate, which has contributed to a worldwide obesity epidemic.
What is the confused consumer to do? A certain scepticism
of mainstream health reportage would help. If possible, try to find out more
about the original research – and when it comes to coping with “yo-yo” dietary
trends, the sage advice of “everything in moderation” has stood the test of
time.
No comments:
Post a Comment